High-yield PMI-ACP® review: agile mindset and complexity, leadership and facilitation, backlog and value delivery, flow metrics, risk and impediments, waste reduction, and continuous improvement patterns.
Use this as your last-mile PMI-ACP® review. Pair it with the Syllabus for coverage and Practice for speed.
For exam format and official policy details, see Overview.
flowchart TD
A["Vision + outcomes"] --> B["Backlog (ordered by value)"]
B --> C["Slice small + define acceptance"]
C --> D["Deliver an increment"]
D --> E["Review + measure + learn"]
E --> F["Adapt backlog + process"]
F --> C
If you can state these three items from any question stem, you’re usually close to the best answer:
| Domain | Nature of work | Best response pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Clear/Simple | known knowns | sense → categorize → respond |
| Complicated | known unknowns | sense → analyze → respond |
| Complex | unknown unknowns | probe → sense → respond (experiments) |
| Chaotic | crisis | act → sense → respond (stabilize first) |
Exam cue: if requirements are changing and learning is needed, pick actions that reduce uncertainty quickly.
| Mode | Use when | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Training | knowledge gap | skill baseline |
| Coaching | performance gap | better behavior/outcomes |
| Mentoring | growth/role development | long-term capability |
| Element | Purpose | Common exam cue |
|---|---|---|
| Sprint goal | focus on outcome | protects scope trade-offs |
| Definition of Done | quality gate | avoids “done-ish” increments |
| Review | feedback + value check | validate assumptions |
| Retrospective | improve the system | fix root causes, not symptoms |
Anti-patterns: skipping refinement, using daily sync as reporting, treating sprint plan as contract.
| Metric | What it measures | Better for |
|---|---|---|
| Cycle time | start → finish for an item | improving flow |
| Lead time | request → delivery | customer experience |
| Throughput | items finished per time | capacity + forecasting |
| WIP | work in progress | spotting overload |
| Need | Technique | Why |
|---|---|---|
| fast sizing | T‑shirt / relative sizing | low overhead |
| consensus sizing | planning poker | reveals assumptions |
| large set estimate | affinity estimation | scales well |
Rule: estimates are for decisions; avoid false precision.
Common waste in knowledge work: waiting, handoffs, rework, overproduction, excess WIP, unclear acceptance, context switching.
Fix pattern: visualize flow → identify bottleneck → reduce WIP → remove constraint → repeat.